Playing with words is like building sand castles were politics is building stone castles.
Post modernism (sand) is a perfect fit for the #DeathCult when building with sand you maybe need to think on this.
Stone makes better foundations.
I was tempted to try and figure out your cryptic metaphors but I should probably say upfront, you sound a lot like Jordon Peterson.
I'll explain nonbinary gender and left wing shit posting to you soonish. The problem here is that you're reposting a right wing meme and failing to differentiate between left wing and right wing postmodernism. So you'd like to encourage fellow comrades to focus on infrastructure projects but, for those who don't know you better, you appear to be repeating a fascism
@yaaps @aaaaargZombies am simply seeing post modernism and the shit built on top of it as posion. I thought this 20 years ago when it was alive when doing my MA on vagabonds and Hitchhiking at university. Now that it's well and truly dead. From the little I know of Paterson etc they are the right feeding on the decay of the left. Think I have a few blog posts on this http://Hamishcampbell.com if you are interested :)
If you create a binery to negate a binery you have done nothing
If you creat a metanarative to negate metanarative then you have done nothing.
If you build your world on nothing... Sand at best you do nothing.
Yes language is messy, but it's what we have. Power is ALWAYS economic/technology in the end, and our economics is based on power feed by violence.
What does non violent power look like?
Were do we go from here?
Nonbinary is a collective bargaining banner for all the genders that aren't adequately represented by male or female. It includes genders that *are* male and/or female, but inadequately represented by those labels. Nonbinary is the simple. You've assumed properties of nonbinary based on the etymology, taken on a pedantic tone, and been wrong loudly
Where we go from here is you apologize, stop making assumptions, and stay in your lane
@yaaps @aaaaargZombies OK, so you are talking about gender, and I am talking about post-modernism... we understand that. OK back to postmodernism for me, its a poisones mess and the things built from this poison are adding to the mess.. Yes, this is not simple... and language is not hard. Where do we go from here?
@yaaps @aaaaargZombies where does this idea of left and right post-modernism come from? If the idea is already a zombie, why are people pushing it? Maybe it is because post-modernism is just another modernist ideology like others and some people like the religuse side of life and some the secular... am seeing the conspiracy crap as a religion... much leftism has had the ring of religion over its history, nothing new.
The #deathcult is worshipped by the right and the left, its common sense.
I was taught, growing up, that people created science and came out of the dark ages, because of Christianity. The reasoning behind this was that people looked for order in the universe because they expected it and they expected order because they believed in God. That's religion
Postmodernism, in reductionist terms, says that everything is meaningless. I'm going to explain why that is not religion. Even though I don't agree with that statement or the framing that created it, it is science, it is good science, and here's why:
It's Karl Popper, whom leftist love for the Paradox of Tolerance and revile for his criticism of Marx in The Open Society, who provides the most concise test for the difference between religion and science. It's this... Science makes falsifiable claims
We have a claim that modernism is meaningless, along with it those things that created modernism and those things created by modernism are meaningless, which, ironically enough, includes postmodernism. We aren't going to prove modernism, capitalism, colonialism or much else stemming from the worldview that created it to be meaningful, but if those who are products of modernism and postmodernism can find meaning in ourselves and in one another then we've falsified that claim
This establishes that there is meaning in life derived independently of belief in God and acceptance of colonialism. What differentiates left-wing postmodernism from the right-wing postmodernism is that the latter promotes the futility in order to preserve capitalism and colonizer structures while the latter subverts it to dismantle capitalism and colonialism
The problem, of course, is that leftist postmodernists can fail as well as any one else at rejecting colonialism and the transient benefits they enjoy as a consequence. Feel free to continue saying that postmodernism is a problem, but please be aware that you might find that you're actually defending colonialism
To support this server and the OMN project https://opencollective.com/open-media-network